Your Tax Dollars Going To Study Gay Men’s Penis Size

I only wish I was joking.  We each work hard everyday, fight traffic to get into our work places, and dedicated most of our daytime hours to making money to support our families.  Obviously, we pay our taxes- or at least some of us do- and we assume that the government is being responsible with our money.  Okay, we know better than that- but sometimes it’s fun to pretend.  However, this little piece of news shows the blatant waste of our taxpayer dollars and the ridiculous things that our blood, sweat and tears are funding.  WARNING: graphic description ahead. 

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) subsidized a study attempting to find out if a gay man’s penis size has any correlation with his sexual health.

The research, titled “The Association between Penis Size and Sexual Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men,” began in 2006 and surveyed 1,065 gay men. Among its key findings: Those gay men who felt they had small or inadequate penis sizes were more likely to become “bottoms,” or anal receptive, while gay men with larger penises were more likely to identify themselves as “tops,” or anal insertive.

Another discovery from the research: men with smaller penises were more likely to be psychologically troubled than those with larger genitalia. The goal of the study was to understand the “real individual-level consequences of living in a penis-centered society.”

The researchers at Hunter College Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies Training (CHEST) got taxpayer money as part of an NIH grant that went to Public Health Solutions and the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI).

NDRI has received taxpayer money since 1985 for “behavioral science research on drug abuse, AIDS and crime.” NIH records show that NDRI has received more than $15 million since 2000.

The gay men penis-size study falls under the NDRI’s drug abuse, AIDS and crime research category. In 2006, the year the organization started funding the penis-size research, it received $899,769 in taxpayer money.

Grant records indicate that NIH funds NDRI wth taxpayer dollars in order to “prepare behavioral scientists, especially from minority backgrounds, for careers in drug abuse research and allied fields” — a goal accomplished by “recruiting and appointing promising scientists, half from minority backgrounds, for traineeships,” giving them “advanced training in substantive topics and theory, research methods and practices, and the ethical conduct of research,” and by ”mentoring and advising trainees.”

“We’ve got nameless, faceless bureaucrats who thought this was a good use of taxpayer money,” says Andrea Lafferty, president of the Traditional Values Coalition, which surfaced the penis-size study. “But, at the end of the day, it was the NIH directors who signed off on it. These nameless, faceless bureacrats seem to think the American taxpayers are a limitless ATM machine.”

Our government is out of control, our country is broke, and yet we are spending almost a million dollars on a study such as this.  And yet, nobody on the left can figure out where to start concerning spending cuts.

About The Author: Brittany Pounders is a conservative political commentator, blogger, and freelancer. She is a frequent guest columnist for The Toronto Sun, and can be heard through many different radio and media outlets such as The Blaze Radio Network, The Chris Salcedo Show, The Ed Dean Radio Show, has appeared on The Glenn Beck Show and regularly on cable news channels, including NewsmaxTv, One America News Network, America Trends, and the Fox News with Neil Cavuto. She resides in Texas with her husband and is raising three of the finest little people in the world. Follow her on… Facebook or @LibertyBritt

  • torreon

    And you agreed with spending $899,769.00 of tax payers money to study gay men penis size is ok?
    You Sir, are a goof.

  • Cody

    This article is wrong. If anyone reads the full article, you will see that little, if any grant money at all was spent on this lone study. The grant is linked to this study along with COUNTLESS other studies for HIV/AIDS research. Uh oh….looks like someone didn't do their homework and just likes to write BS articles about other BS articles before reading them…..Awwwww, such a cute little writer Brittany is.

    • torreon

      And you agreed with spending $899,769.00 of tax payers money to study gay men penis size is ok?
      You Sir, are a goof.

  • Martha

    I guess next they will study why women don't have a penis. Go figure!